Recent immigrants to Britain are better educated, pay more taxes and draw less state benefits than native Britons.
The findings, taken from official government data, came in a heavyweight report into the fiscal consequences of immigration to the UK, published on Monday by the Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM) at University College London.
The authors of the report concluded that fears that “benefit tourists” were coming to the UK with no intention of working were “disconnected from reality”. David Cameron previously suggested immigration was a “constant strain” on public services.
According to the report, immigrants who arrived after 1999 in Britain, and made up a third of the overall immigrant population in the UK in 2011, were 45% less likely to receive state benefits than native Brits. They were also 3% less likely to live in social housing.
They were also better educated than native Britons. In 2011, 32% of those from the European Economic Area (EEA) and 43% of those from outside of the region had a university degree, whereas for native Brits it was less than one in five (21%).
Recent immigrants from the European Economic Area (EEA) contributed on average 34% more taxes than they received as transfers, while those from outside of the EEA contributed 2% more.
Professor Christian Dustmann, director of CReAM and co-author of the study, said: “Immigrants who arrived since 2000 have made a very sizeable net fiscal contribution and therefore helped to reduce the fiscal burden on UK-born workers.
“Our study also suggests that over the last decade or so, the UK has benefited fiscally from immigrants from EEA countries, who have put in considerably more in taxes and contributions than they received in benefits and transfers.
“Given this evidence, claims about “benefit tourism” by EEA immigrants seem to be disconnected from reality.” see more